Difficulty of this class depends heavily on how broad your own experience is. They are a bit dry and hard to follow at times (especially when the sentences are looooooong). I wish they would break this into 2 classes One for testing and one for analysis. The documentations on the libraries/frameworks/tools were sufficient and clear. Really good course content. Overall the class covers some neat topics. I'd say that this course is more oriented toward OMSCS students whose background is in CS and compilers rather than a software engineering type. Since this was my first course in the program I don't have much basis for comparison, but I can't think of much that could have made this course better. "Ok": the 4 year cliffhanger and counting. My advice, proceed with caution if you choose to take this course. Georgia Tech Student2019-01-03T15:01:19Zfall 2018. If you change a file in the repo that is not turned in, then when they try to compile with the unchanged file, you will have compilation errors and get a zero on the assignment. 1 quiz per lesson and you can complete the quizzes any time before the end of the course. I find this really disgusting considering we are always asked not to plagiarize. Eventually, I found out my root privilege issue with my VM was a super easy fix and wasnt a big issue after all but I ended up running in circles for a day or 2 because I got the wrong TA in office hours. Rating: 2 / 5Difficulty: 4 / 5Workload: 16 hours / week, Georgia Tech Student2020-01-26T19:25:22Zspring 2020. I had to spend some time to understand how the algorithm from the lectures mapped to the data structures provided in the lab. All of them, except lab 4, require extensive prep time due to resource gathering (finding forums on how to do x, y, z) because most of the time what is expected of you to do is straightforward but the resources for LLVM are unhelpful, limited, or are not in sync with the courses version of LLVM. Learn Software Testing With Online Courses and Programs | edX things have changed since I got my degree 25 years ago?) Georgia Tech Student2016-06-02T17:56:18Zspring 2016. I had to put a lot of hours studying the material and I fared very well on both. you have 3 hours to take the tests, You could potentially take the full time. Here are some examples of topics to cover. This course will examine advanced software testing techniques. This course is not very hard for me. It definitely changed my thought process about writing code and testing, thinking thoroughly about the variables/pointers that are being created in memory, making sure to free those resources. Time spent - This is hard to calculate, as some weeks were 40 hours, and then there were stretches of time where there was no work whatsoever. First problem, completely non-existent professor. The lectures were a little long but not oppressively. Second half teaches you tools that may actually be useful, but less than 50% good does not make up for the horrid 50%. L. Graves, Mary Jean Harrold, Jung-Min Kim, Adam Porter and Gregg Although there are very few Piazza posts compared to my other courses since most students engage in private discussion with TA's on Slack. I am glad I took the class, although I've decided that the topic is not one I'm interested in. Fortunately, if you get all 100%s on the labs, you can survive Cs on the exams and still get an A. Georgia Tech Student2019-07-29T09:45:24Zsummer 2019. However, the aspect of the course that I did not like were the exams. I put very little effort compared to my previous 2 classes and did good. The assignments were written in a very dense academic style that made for a lot of confusion in the students. I'm not sure if the tools you learn in the assignments will be used in your future career, but they do serve the purpose of helping you learn. I would say a some previous exposure to C is really helpful. This course is surprisingly good and I think it is underrated. The lab material has ample guidance to get you started with everything properly and you will never feel that this should have been explained better or worded differently. With that said, the final half of the course is definitely my favorite part. Rating: 5 / 5Difficulty: 3 / 5Workload: 8 hours / week, Georgia Tech Student2021-04-13T15:31:12Zspring 2021. Rating: 5 / 5Difficulty: 3 / 5Workload: 25 hours / week, Georgia Tech Student2020-10-19T03:55:03Zfall 2020. If not, it's not too difficult to get the additional background you need, and it's something you should do anyway if you want to survive a grad-level CS program. Neelam Lab 7: This one is the second difficult for me. I went through a couple of hoops to get docker running and then it just wouldnt work. The first 3 projects (project 0-2) were pretty challenging; project 1 alone almost took me 30 hours to finish. Manual testing can be further divided into three types of testing, which are as follows: For more information about manual testing, refers to the below link: https://www.javatpoint.com/manual-testing. The head TAs are extremely knowledgable and give great advice, so strategize which OH you go to. Labs have a similar issue, some of them require you to find a bug in their code but the code-base is messy and tough to see what it wants to achieve. After that, as the course progresses, we will move to more advanced topics. Just don't think you'll skate by, without putting in the effort. If you desire to (I didn't), they seem knowledgeable and willing enough to dialogue on where the course content intersects with the real world in their experience. This was one of the more difficult classes I've ever taken. Also, Dr. Pryby and the TAs were responsive, fair, helpful, and awesome. It's only the work of excellent TA's that save this course from complete disaster. Workload: 2.5 Hours. Just basically clicking some things into place so that a third party algorithm can solve the problem for you. So I just engineered it from the ground up. Some of the TA's often went out of their way during the Office Hours, spending time with each person, often going longer than the 1 hour time in order to communicate, understand, and help each student. Georgia Tech Student2016-05-03T12:36:13Zspring 2016. Some of the assignments were extremely frustrating with abstract concepts I have never seen outside of the class and likely never will. Instructor Chris is active on Piazza and does help out all the students, I had some conflict during the end, but overall he is an excellent instructor. A fresh tester may execute a test case once. October 6, 2021. Everyone starts posting hints/discussions the Thu/Fri before the Mon when the lab is due and that info can save you a ton of time versus struggling on your own. Rating: 1 / 5Difficulty: 3 / 5Workload: 8 hours / week, Georgia Tech Student2016-04-30T14:36:43Zspring 2016. This was my first OMSCS course and overall I liked it. I felt that the labs did help reinforce the learning. Exams were challenging but fair. The midterm was very challenging, and didn't have enough time allocated for it. They provided sample questions and prof. goes over them for both the exams. All labs were opened during the 2nd week of classes, so students can (and will) work far ahead on the labs. The head TA was active, but his style was also a problem, usually answering questions with more complicated responses that did little to address the fundamental problems that students were having. along with introduction and familiarity with Autom. - he has the authority to make policy decisions. They do a good job of actually getting you to understand the major concepts of the class. Workload: 1.5 hours. Fellow students were more helpful (as is often the case). This was a very tough class, but there were both pros and cons. The instructors were responsive and helpful as were the TAs. They do not have a weekly office hours recording and only respond to questions privately via Slack, which I definitely miss from other classes. Ok, bleeding-edge might be a bit of a stretch, but you will learn something new :-). In all seriousness though, this class actually manages to decimate intellectual curiousity and for that I suppose a round of applause is in order. Questions came out of complete left field and I feel are more ego-driven to show off how smart the professor is and his vast amount of knoweldge outside of Software testing than to actually test us on what we know. "You will use my API. " Copyright 2011-2021 www.javatpoint.com. The videos were also weak in a number of areas where complicated concepts were glossed over and never really explained in great detail leaving the TAs to have to try and explain these concepts. Some were easy and some very hard. But anyways, this assignment was not that bad. The lectures aren't very rigorous, and most of the labs are pretty easy. This course is EXTREMELY front loaded. Rating: N/ADifficulty: 3 / 5Workload: 5 hours / week, Georgia Tech Student2016-03-19T13:29:12Zspring 2016, Excellent presentation, clear and concise lectures Georgia Tech Student2018-01-03T21:14:22Zfall 2017. The labs are very useful to understand the concept in the lesson. Related to Lab 1 so I ended up spending a little more time ramping up on stuff that should have been known already. Similar to Lab 3, this involved using the KLEE tool to add constraints (klee_assume()) & assertions (klee_assert(0)) for the desired result. In this Free Selenium training tutorial, we cover all Selenium concepts (basic selenium test scripts to the advanced testing framework) in detail with easy to understand practical examples. The course is currently structured with half of the course grade coming from projects (some due within one week) and half coming from proctored tests. This course uses both Piazza and Slack. This course provided an introduction to a variety of software analysis and testing methodologies. I come from a STEM background (EE) and I have a STEM job (CS/IT). It was awesome when I got that algorithm running. The biggest positive right now is that I took the final yesterday and I am just so happy that is over and done! Quizzes in lectures really help understanding the content Some will require extra reading but overall they should only take a few hours to finish. What I didn't like about this class was that it was mainly about figuring things out they will introduce new things frameworks and API's that you've never seen before but you need to know how to read documentation and learn quick. Winter Commencement The assignments used a variety of programming languages (which I thoroughly enjoyed) and gave insight to the usage of the techniques from the lectures. 12/20/01 (Thursday), **Thanksgiving Holiday The assignments and lectures are very informative and interesting. Top 50 Software Testing Interview Questions and Answers In 2023 - Edureka Average for the midterm exam was in mid-50. It couldn't be easier to give this exam. First the positives: Michael and Ben ran the class and did a good job keeping up with needs as well as having office hours. This is a much different and better course than the previous semesters may indicate. If you do not get hang of LLVM then you are pretty much guaranteed to do worse. Professor and TAs were some of the best I've had. I got stuck on several projects and his hints were instrumental in me doing well on (and completing) the projects. Rest all were C/C++ LLVM based. Astronomers have discovered a rocky Earth-sized exoplanet they believe is "likely carpeted with volcanoes" and may be capable of supporting an atmosphere and liquid water, according to a paper published in Nature on Wednesday. Even after putting tremendous effort, many things remain unclear and there is no where to turn to learn, other than depend upon the understanding of fellow students who themselves are struggling. Each lab is a new one, so may have to spend lot of time understanding the lab first and then work on it. Rating: 2 / 5Difficulty: 2 / 5Workload: 5 hours / week, Georgia Tech Student2019-09-21T13:21:00Zfall 2019, Course content is pretty mediocre, although what led me to drop the course was a combination of having the most aggressive proctoring rules in OMSCS and confusing lab instructions. This is my first semester and I was very excited about this class and now I am about to withdraw. "But sir, there're at least 5 libraries that do what yours does and are actually maintained " All labs were weighted 8% with the exception of Lab 0 at 4%. You will walk away from the course with a number of different automated analysis techniques well explored. There were seven projects, with varying difficulty. Overall I wouldn't take this class unless you have a deep interest in testing - specifically the development of automated testing. The harder ones were worth more points. The challenge increases in Part 2 with the implementation of the pseudocode algorithm from the lectures. I thought the class was pretty interesting. Testing can involve implementing techniques with the intent to locate software defects. This course goes against the ethics of teaching itself. If you are familiar with C and scripting the course may be a good one for you. Working full time and taking classes at the same time is stressful enough, I would rather not add the stress of getting failed by random gotchas, Rating: 2 / 5Difficulty: 3 / 5Workload: 5 hours / week, Georgia Tech Student2019-08-10T13:54:35Zfall 2018. Rating: 4 / 5Difficulty: 3 / 5Workload: 8 hours / week, Georgia Tech Student2020-12-18T00:09:41Zfall 2020. I found most of the assignments really difficult, mostly because the documentation provided with the software was bad and, strangely, there were no teacher-provided materials (other than scattershot Q&A) towards filling that in. Lab 3: Easier than medium level. I'm told that such a project is being developed, so maybe you'll get to do it instead. In spite of all of this, the material was genuinely interesting. Overall: I didn't find the class too difficult and it served nicely as a companion course in a semester where I needed to take two classes. Midterm and Finals were challenging but very fair and would focus on testing the understanding of the concepts taught in class. Certifications for Software Testing - ASTQB: ISTQB in the U.S. Background: Mechanical engineering undergrad, not too much depth in different programming languages, but work as software engineer. The VM environment for the project(s) were stable and only had 1 minor missing component on one of the later projects. He will run your code through a plagarism detection system (MOSS). You need to be proficient in Java, C, discrete math being active on the forum, helping out other students, doing the course surveys etc.). There are 7/8 projects (there was a "project 0" - depends on if you count it). If you don't have familiarity with this library or are skilled at digging into documentation that doesn't have something like a "quick start guide" then this will cause a jump in difficulty. Since he is actually an instructor and not just a TA, he has much more authority than normal Head TAs do. I use TypeScript professionally on a daily basis, so this lab was quite easy. This course is about using different techniques and tools to analyze and test software.